16 de mayo de 2018

Creative Coding and Intercultural Projects in Higher Education: a Case Study in Three Universities / Codificación creativa y proyectos interculturales en Educación Superior: Un estudio de caso en tres universidades

Creative Coding and Intercultural Projects in Higher Education: a Case Study in Three Universities / Codificación creativa y proyectos interculturales en Educación Superior: Un estudio de caso en tres universidades

José-Manuel Sáez-López, Yoshiro Miyata, María-Concepción Domínguez-Garrido


This study analyses the concepts, attitudes and practices of 113 students from three major universities in different countries (Japan, Mexico and Spain) related to the process of coding to create multimedia presentations in an intercultural context. A project framed in two research groups has been developed to enhance coding skills in intercultural multimedia presentations. A Student t-test, a mixed questionnaire with a pretest-posttest design, a Wilcoxon test and interviews were administered to students using data triangulation. The results show that fostering intercultural multimedia activities and interaction using coding and communication tools in a university has several advantages regarding ICT skills. Research showed statistically significant efficacy regarding the ability of students to understand the management and use of multimedia content through block programming. Although there are just a few limitations related to Scratch programming language, students highlighted that Scratch is easy to use, funny and perfect for presentations and animations.
El presente estudio analiza conceptos, actitudes y prácticas de 113 alumnos de tres importantes universidades de diferentes países (Japón, México y España) en relación al proceso de codificación para crear presentaciones multimedia en un contexto intercultural. El proyecto está enmarcado en dos grupos de investigación, y ha sido desarrollado para mejorar habilidades de codificación en presentaciones multimedia interculturales. Se aplica una prueba t de Student, un cuestionario mixto con un diseño pretest-postest, una prueba de Wilcoxon y entrevistas a los alumnos, haciendo uso de triangulación de datos. Los resultados muestran que el fomento de actividades multimedia y la interacción intercultural utilizando herramientas de codificación y la comunicación en una universidad tiene varias ventajas con respecto a las competencias TIC. La investigación demostró estadísticamente una eficacia significativa en cuanto a la capacidad de los estudiantes para comprender el manejo y uso de contenidos multimedia a través de programación por bloques. Aunque hay alguna limitación relacionada con el lenguaje de programación Scratch, los estudiantes destacaron que Scratch es fácil de usar, divertido y perfecto para presentaciones y animaciones.

Palabras clave

Collaborative learning; evaluation methodologies; ICT framework; Design Based Research; Project Based Learning / Aprendizaje Basado en Proyectos; Aprendizaje Colaborativo; Investigación Basada en el Diseño; Metodologías de Evaluación; TIC.

Texto completo:


ADEC Guiding Principles for Distance Learning and Teaching (1999). American distance education consortium. Retrieved from http://www.adec.edu/admin/papers/distanceteaching_principles.html
Anastasiades, P. S., Filippousis, G., Karvunis, L., Siakas, S., Tomazinakis, A., Giza, P., & Mastoraki, H. (2010). Interactive videoconferencing for collaborative learning at a distance in the school of 21st century: A case study in elementary schools in Greece. Computers in Education, 54(2), 321-339.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41, 16-25.
Anderson, T. (2005). Design-based research and its application to a call centre innovation in distance education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 31(2), 69-83. Retrieved from http://auspace.athabascau.ca:8080/dspace/bitstream/2149/741/1/design_based_research.pdf
Ausubel, D. (1978). In defense of advance organizers: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research, 48, 251-257.
Barab, S., & Squire, B. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. Retrieved from http://website.education.wisc.edu/kdsquire/manuscripts/jls-barab-squire-design.pdf
Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design. American Educational Research Association meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/Brennan_Resnick_AERA2012_CT.pdf
Brennan, K. (2012): Best of both worlds: Issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school. (Doctoral Dissertation). MIT. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~kbrennan/files/dissertation/Brennan_Dissertation.pdf
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Bruner, J. (1966).Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London and New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 8–19.
Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298–315.
Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Gerstein, R. (2000). Videoconferencing in the classroom: Special projects toward cultural understanding. Computers in the Schools, 16(3/4), 177–186.
Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1988). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jonassen, D. H. (1977). Approaches to the study of visual literacy: A brief survey for media personnel. Pennsylvania Media Review, 11, 15-18.
Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311.
López-Escribano, C., & Sánchez-Montoya, R. (2012). Scratch y necesidades educativas especiales: Programación para todos. RED, Revista de Educación a Distancia, 34.
Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B., & Eastmong, E. (2010). The Scratch programming language and environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 1-15.
Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori, & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 51–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mingfong, J., Yam San, C., & Ek Ming, T. (2010). Unpacking the design process in design-based research. Wong, S.L., Kong, S. C & Yu, F. Y. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, 543-547). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Miyata, Y., Ueshiba, T., & Harada, Y. (2012). Cultivating constructive mindset in world museum, collaboration across cultures and generations, paper presented to the Constructionism 2012, Athens, Greece.
Näsström, G. (2009). Interpretation of standards with Bloom’s revised taxonomy: A comparison of teachers and assessment experts. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32, 39-51.
Omatsey, J. N. (1999). Teaching through tele-conferencing. Some curriculum challenges. College Student Journal, 33(3), 346–353.
Owen, J. M., & Rogers, P. J. (1999). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (International ed.). London, England: Sage.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books. Retrieved from https://creative-computing.appspot.com/assets/lib/Papert-1993.pdf
Reeves, T. (2000). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other developmental strategies. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Retrieved from http://itech1.coe.uga.edu/~treeves/AERA2000Reeves.pdf
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Hernández, A. M., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009) Scratch: Programming for all, Communications of the ACM, 52(11). Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/Scratch-CACM-final.pdf
Sáez, Leo, L., & Miyata (2013). Uso de edmodo en proyectos colaborativos internacionales en educación primaria. Edutec, revista electrónica de tecnología educativa, 43, 1-17. Retrieved from http://edutec.rediris.es/revelec2/revelec43/edmodo_proyectos_colaborativos_internacionales_primaria.htm
Sáez-López, J.M., Román-González, M. y Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school. A two year case study using scratch in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141 .http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
Stewart, M., & Vallance, M. (2008). The impact of synchronous inter-networked teacher training in information and communication technology integration. Computers & Education, 51, 34–5.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Chapter 6 Interaction between learning and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 1, 139–145.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.2.15796